Arrow Transformer Library

atl alternatives and similar packages

Based on the "Control" category

• transient

  9.9 6.4 atl VS transient

  Making composable programs with multithreading, events and distributed computing

• pipes

  9.8 4.5 atl VS pipes

  Compositional pipelines

• machines

  9.8 5.0 atl VS machines

  Networked stream transducers

• mtl

  9.6 4.0 atl VS mtl

  Monad classes, using functional dependencies

• free

  9.6 5.2 atl VS free

  Monads for free

• record

  9.6 0.0 atl VS record

  Anonymous records

• apecs

  9.6 - atl VS apecs

  A fast ECS for game engine programming

• recursion-schemes

  9.6 6.8 atl VS recursion-schemes

  Generalized bananas, lenses and barbed wire

• freer-simple

  9.5 3.1 atl VS freer-simple

  Implementation of a friendly effect system for Haskell.

• classy-prelude

  9.5 5.0 atl VS classy-prelude

  A typeclass-based Prelude.

• foldl

  9.5 4.5 atl VS foldl

  Composable, streaming, and efficient left folds

• auto

  9.5 2.1 atl VS auto

  Denotative, locally stateful programming DSL & platform

• extensible-effects

  9.5 7.8 atl VS extensible-effects

  An Alternative to Monad Transformers

• classy-prelude-yesod

  9.5 - atl VS classy-prelude-yesod

  Provide a classy prelude including common Yesod functionality.

• abstract-par

  9.4 0.0 atl VS abstract-par

  Type classes generalizing the functionality of the 'monad-par' library.

• safe-exceptions

  9.4 0.3 atl VS safe-exceptions

  Safe, consistent, and easy exception handling

• hask

  9.4 0.0 atl VS hask

  Categories

• ComonadSheet

  9.3 0.0 atl VS ComonadSheet

  A library for expressing spreadsheet-like computations as the fixed-points of comonads.

• frpnow

  9.3 0.0 atl VS frpnow

  Principled practical FRP

• transient-universe

  9.3 6.6 atl VS transient-universe

  Remote execution and map-reduce

• either

  9.2 5.3 atl VS either

  An either monad transformer

• these

  9.2 6.7 atl VS these

  An either-or-both data type & a generalized 'zip with padding' typeclass

• retry

  9.2 4.1 atl VS retry

  Retry combinators for monadic actions that may fail

• distributed-closure

  9.2 3.7 atl VS distributed-closure

  Serializable closures for distributed programming.

• pipes-core

  9.2 0.0 atl VS pipes-core

  Compositional pipelines

• distributed-process-platform

  9.2 0.0 atl VS distributed-process-platform

  The Cloud Haskell Application Platform

• unliftio

  9.1 7.4 atl VS unliftio

  The MonadUnliftIO typeclass for unlifting monads to IO (batteries included)

• cloud-haskell

  9.1 0.0 atl VS cloud-haskell

  The Cloud Haskell Application Platform

• parallel

  9.0 3.4 atl VS parallel

  Parallel programming library

• tardis

  9.0 0.0 atl VS tardis

  Bidirectional state monad transformer

• operational

  9.0 0.0 atl VS operational

  Implementation of difficult monads made easy with operational semantics.

• contravariant

  9.0 5.4 atl VS contravariant

  Contravariant functors

• errors

  8.9 0.0 atl VS errors

  Simplified error-handling

• deepseq

  8.9 3.1 atl VS deepseq

  Deep evaluation of data structures

• monad-control

  8.9 0.0 atl VS monad-control

  Lift control operations, like exception catching, through monad transformers

• exceptions

  8.9 5.7 atl VS exceptions

  Extensible optionally-pure exceptions

• ifcxt

  8.9 0.0 atl VS ifcxt

  put if statements within type constraints

• mmorph

  8.8 3.2 atl VS mmorph

  Monad morphisms

• time-warp

  8.8 1.7 atl VS time-warp

  Distributed systems execution emulation

• freer-effects

  8.8 0.0 atl VS freer-effects

  Implementation of effect system for Haskell.

• lens-tutorial

  8.8 2.5 atl VS lens-tutorial

  Tutorial for the lens library

• objective

  8.8 0.0 atl VS objective

  Composable objects

• motor

  8.7 5.1 atl VS motor

  Type-safe effectful state machines in Haskell

• basic-prelude

  8.7 0.0 atl VS basic-prelude

  An enhanced core prelude; a common foundation for alternate preludes.

• ether

  8.7 2.3 atl VS ether

  Monad transformers and classes

• hpc-coveralls

  8.7 0.0 atl VS hpc-coveralls

  Coveralls.io support for Haskell.

• ImperativeHaskell

  8.5 0.0 atl VS ImperativeHaskell

  A library for writing Imperative style haskell.

• effect-monad

  8.5 0.0 atl VS effect-monad

  Embeds effect systems into Haskell using graded monads

• ixmonad

  8.5 0.0 atl VS ixmonad

  Embeds effect systems into Haskell using parameteric effect monads

• pipes-parse

  8.5 1.4 atl VS pipes-parse

  Parsing infrastructure for the pipes ecosystem

Do you think we are missing an alternative of atl or a related project?

Add another 'Control' Package

Popular Comparisons

• atl
  vs
  extensible-effects
• apecs
  vs
  frpnow
• pipes-conduit
  vs
  pipes-bytestring
• unpack-funcs
  vs
  cloud-haskell
• weighted-search
  vs
  parallel