Compare ConstraintKinds and ImperativeHaskell's popularity and activity
Popularity
6.2
Growing
Activity
0.0
Stable
Popularity
8.5
Stable
Activity
0.0
Stable
ConstraintKinds | ImperativeHaskell | |
7 | 74 | |
5 | 4 | |
4 | 3 | |
over 9 years ago | - | |
over 7 years ago | over 11 years ago | |
3 | 6 | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only | |
Control | Control, Language, Development, Embedded |
Solutions like Dependabot or Renovate update but don't merge dependencies. You need to do it manually while it could be fully automated! Add a Merge Queue to your workflow and stop caring about PR management & merging. Try Mergify for free.
Interest over time of ConstraintKinds and ImperativeHaskell
Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs.
More comparisons
-
ImperativeHaskellvsapecs
-
ConstraintKindsvshpc-coveralls
-
ConstraintKindsvsmmorph
-
apecsvsfrpnow
-
pipes-bytestringvspipes-conduit
-
parallelvsweighted-search
Do not miss the trending Haskell projects and news
» Subscribe to our newsletter «
» Subscribe to our newsletter «