laop alternatives and similar packages
Based on the "Data" category.
Alternatively, view laop alternatives based on common mentions on social networks and blogs.

semanticsource
Parsing, analyzing, and comparing source code across many languages 
text
Haskell library for space and timeefficient operations over Unicode text. 
codebuilder
Packages for defining APIs, running them, generating client code and documentation. 
compendiumclient
Mu (μ) is a purely functional framework for building micro services. 
cassava
A CSV parsing and encoding library optimized for ease of use and high performance 
resourcepool
A highperformance striped resource pooling implementation for Haskell 
primitive
This package provides various primitive memoryrelated operations. 
discrimination
Fast linear time sorting and discrimination for a large class of data types 
dependentsum
Dependent sums and supporting typeclasses for comparing and displaying them 
reflection
Reifies arbitrary Haskell terms into types that can be reflected back into terms 
dependentmap
Dependentlytyped finite maps (partial dependent products) 
streaming
An optimized general monad transformer for streaming applications, with a simple prelude of functions 
texticu
This package provides the Haskell Data.Text.ICU library, for performing complex manipulation of Unicode text. 
orgmodeparse
Attoparsec parser combinators for parsing orgmode structured text! 
scientific
Arbitraryprecision floatingpoint numbers represented using scientific notation
Static code analysis for 29 languages.
Do you think we are missing an alternative of laop or a related project?
README
laop  Linear Algebra of Programming library
The LAoP discipline generalises relations and functions treating them as Boolean matrices and in turn consider these as arrows.
LAoP is a library for algebraic (inductive) construction and manipulation of matrices in Haskell. See my Msc Thesis for the motivation behind the library, the underlying theory, and implementation details.
This module offers many of the combinators mentioned in the work of Macedo (2012) and Oliveira (2012).
See the package in hackage here
A Functional Pearl has been written and can be regarded as the reference document (ACM link) for this library.
Features
This library offers 3 main matrix programming modules:
 One in which matrices are typed with type level natural numbers;
 One in which matrices are typed with arbitrary generic data types;
 One in which matrices are regarded as relations, i.e. boolean matrices;
There's also an experimental module that uses matrices to represent probability distributions.
The most interesting feature is that matrices are represented as an inductive data type. Given this formulation, matrix algorithms can be expressed in a much more elegant and calculational style than the traditional vector of vectors representation. This data type guarantees that a matrix will always have valid dimensions. It can also express block matrix computations naturally, which leads to total, efficient and statically typed manipulation and transformation functions.
Like matrix multiplication, other common operations, such as matrix transposition, benefit from a blockoriented structure that leads to a simple and natural divideandconquer algorithmic solution. Performance wise, this means that without much effort we can obtain optimal cacheoblivious algorithms.
Given this, this new matrix formulation compared to other libraries:
 Is more compositional and polymorphic and does not have partial matrix manipulation functions (hence less chances for usage errors);
 Our implementation of matrices enables simple manipulation of submatrices, making it particularly suitable for formal verification and equation reasoning, using the mathematical framework defined by the linear algebra of programming. Furthermore, the data type constructors ensure that the matrices of this kind are sound, i.e. malformed matrices with incorrect dimensions of the sort, can not be constructed.
Known issues
Unfortunately, due to the use of typelevel programming features, this approach sometimes requires type dimensions to be constrainted, in some way, impossible to write idiomatic Arrow instances, for example. Type inference isn't perfect, when it comes to infer the types of matrices which dimensions are computed using type level naturals multiplication, the compiler needs type annotations in order to succeed. And not all kinds of programs can be modeled using matrices, namely programs that deal with arbitrary infinite data types such as lists or integers (although there are some workarounds).
Notes
This is still a work in progress, any feedback is welcome!
Example
{# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric #}
{# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #}
{# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #}
{# LANGUAGE TypeApplications #}
{# LANGUAGE DataKinds #}
module Main where
import Matrix.Type
import Utils
import Dist
import GHC.TypeLits
import Data.Coerce
import GHC.Generics
import Control.Category hiding (id)
import Prelude hiding ((.))
 Monty Hall Problem
data Outcome = Win  Lose
deriving (Bounded, Enum, Eq, Show, Generic)
switch :: Outcome > Outcome
switch Win = Lose
switch Lose = Win
firstChoice :: Matrix Double () Outcome
firstChoice = col [1/3, 2/3]
secondChoice :: Matrix Double Outcome Outcome
secondChoice = fromF' switch
 Dice sum
type SS = Natural 1 6  Sample Space
sumSS :: SS > SS > Natural 2 12
sumSS = coerceNat (+)
sumSSM = fromF' (uncurry sumSS)
condition :: (Int, Int) > Int > Int
condition (fst, snd) thrd = if fst == snd
then fst * 3
else fst + snd + thrd
conditionSS :: (SS, SS) > SS > Natural 3 18
conditionSS = coerceNat2 condition
conditionalThrows = fromF' (uncurry conditionSS) . khatri (khatri die die) die
die :: Matrix Double () SS
die = col $ map (const (1/6)) [nat @1 @6 1 .. nat 6]
 Sprinkler
rain :: Matrix Double () Bool
rain = col [0.8, 0.2]
sprinkler :: Matrix Double Bool Bool
sprinkler = fromLists [[0.6, 0.99], [0.4, 0.01]]
grass :: Matrix Double (Bool, Bool) Bool
grass = fromLists [[1, 0.2, 0.1, 0.01], [0, 0.8, 0.9, 0.99]]
state :: Matrix Double () (Bool, (Bool, Bool))
state = khatri grass identity . khatri sprinkler identity . rain
grass_wet :: Matrix Double (Bool, (Bool, Bool)) One
grass_wet = row [0,1] . kp1
rainning :: Matrix Double (Bool, (Bool, Bool)) One
rainning = row [0,1] . kp2 . kp2
 Alcuin Puzzle
data Being = Farmer  Fox  Goose  Beans
deriving (Bounded, Enum, Eq, Show, Generic)
data Bank = LeftB  RightB
deriving (Bounded, Enum, Eq, Show, Generic)
eats :: Being > Being > Bool
eats Fox Goose = True
eats Goose Beans = True
eats _ _ = False
eatsR :: R.Relation Being Being
eatsR = R.toRel eats
cross :: Bank > Bank
cross LeftB = RightB
cross RightB = LeftB
crossR :: R.Relation Bank Bank
crossR = R.fromF' cross
  Initial state, everyone in the left bank
locationLeft :: Being > Bank
locationLeft _ = LeftB
locationLeftR :: R.Relation Being Bank
locationLeftR = R.fromF' locationLeft
  Initial state, everyone in the right bank
locationRight :: Being > Bank
locationRight _ = RightB
locationRightR :: R.Relation Being Bank
locationRightR = R.fromF' locationRight
 Properties
 Being at the same bank
sameBank :: R.Relation Being Bank > R.Relation Being Being
sameBank = R.ker
 Risk of somebody eating somebody else
canEat :: R.Relation Being Bank > R.Relation Being Being
canEat w = sameBank w `R.intersection` eatsR
 "Starvation" property.
inv :: R.Relation Being Bank > Bool
inv w = (w `R.comp` canEat w) `R.sse` (w `R.comp` farmer)
where
farmer :: R.Relation Being Being
farmer = R.fromF' (const Farmer)
 Arbitrary state
bankState :: Being > Bank > Bool
bankState Farmer LeftB = True
bankState Fox LeftB = True
bankState Goose RightB = True
bankState Beans RightB = True
bankState _ _ = False
bankStateR :: R.Relation Being Bank
bankStateR = R.toRel bankState
 Main
main :: IO ()
main = do
putStrLn "Monty Hall Problem solution:"
prettyPrint (secondChoice . firstChoice)
putStrLn "\n Sum of dices probability:"
prettyPrint (sumSSM `comp` khatri die die)
putStrLn "\n Conditional dice throw:"
prettyPrint conditionalThrows
putStrLn "\n Checking that the last result is indeed a distribution: "
prettyPrint (bang . sumSSM . khatri die die)
putStrLn "\n Probability of grass being wet:"
prettyPrint (grass_wet . state)
putStrLn "\n Probability of rain:"
prettyPrint (rainning . state)
putStrLn "\n Is the arbitrary state a valid state? (Alcuin Puzzle)"
print (inv bankStateR)
Monty Hall Problem solution:
┌ ┐
│ 0.6666666666666666 │
│ 0.3333333333333333 │
└ ┘
Sum of dices probability:
┌ ┐
│ 2.7777777777777776e2 │
│ 5.555555555555555e2 │
│ 8.333333333333333e2 │
│ 0.1111111111111111 │
│ 0.1388888888888889 │
│ 0.16666666666666666 │
│ 0.1388888888888889 │
│ 0.1111111111111111 │
│ 8.333333333333333e2 │
│ 5.555555555555555e2 │
│ 2.7777777777777776e2 │
└ ┘
Conditional dice throw:
┌ ┐
│ 2.7777777777777776e2 │
│ 9.259259259259259e3 │
│ 1.8518518518518517e2 │
│ 6.481481481481481e2 │
│ 5.555555555555555e2 │
│ 8.333333333333333e2 │
│ 0.12962962962962962 │
│ 0.1111111111111111 │
│ 0.1111111111111111 │
│ 0.12962962962962962 │
│ 8.333333333333333e2 │
│ 5.555555555555555e2 │
│ 6.481481481481481e2 │
│ 1.8518518518518517e2 │
│ 9.259259259259259e3 │
│ 2.7777777777777776e2 │
└ ┘
Checking that the last result is indeed a distribution:
┌ ┐
│ 1.0 │
└ ┘
Probability of grass being wet:
┌ ┐
│ 0.4483800000000001 │
└ ┘
Probability of rain:
┌ ┐
│ 0.2 │
└ ┘
Is the arbitrary state a valid state? (Alcuin Puzzle)
False