dualizer alternatives and similar packages
Based on the "Categories" category

representableprofunctors
This package has been absorbed into profunctorextras.
Do you think we are missing an alternative of dualizer or a related project?
Popular Comparisons
README
→ dualizer ←
Delete half (minus ε) of your Haskell code!
Dualizer allows you to eliminate the dual of all your code. Rather than implementing, say, Comonad
directly, you can define it in terms of its dual – Monad
:
 indicates that Functor is its own dual
labelSelfDual ''Functor
 expands to:

 class Functor f => Coapplicative f where
 extract :: f a > a  the dual of pure
makeDualClass ''Applicative "Coapplicative" [('pure, "extract")]
 expands to:

 class Coapplicative m => Comonad m where
 (=>>) :: m b > (m b > a) > m a
makeDualClass ''Monad "Comonad" [('(>>=) , "=>>")]
See [Categorical.Dual.Example
](src/Categorical/Dual/Example.hs) for a bit more.
The Template Haskell You Need to Know
This library is written using Template Haskell, and while it tries to minimize the familiarity needed to use it (and accepting suggestions/PRs for reducing it further), some still leaks through. Here’s what you need to know.
When naming an existing type, prefix with ''
(e.g., ''Either
), and for an existing value, prefix with '
(e.g., 'fmap
). Names of things to be created are plain String
s.
To allow code to be reified into an AST that Template Haskell can work with, it uses a special “quasiquotation” syntax, opening with [d
and closing with ]
that looks like [dyour :: Code > Here]
when used. There are variants of this that use something other than d
in the opening, but we don’t need them in this library.
Defining Duals
There are three approaches here to defining duals, and they are listed in order of preference.
 define them simultaneously
 define the dual of an existing thing
 label two existing things as duals of each other
Simultaneous definition is the only way to automatically define duals of expressions. If you define the dual of an existing value, you will only get its type, and you will still need to provide the expression.
You can, however, still label existing values as duals of each other.
Defining Duals Simultaneously
makeDualDec
[d cata :: Functor f => (f a > a) > Fix f > a
cata f = f . fmap (cata f) . unfix ]
"ana"
makeDualDec [dtype Algebra f a = f a > a] "Coalgebra"
This form can also be nested, allowing the definition of duals for type classes, etc. (NB: This can’t actually work this way).
makeDualDec [d
class Functor f => Applicative f where
$$(makeDualDec [dpure :: a > f a] "extract")
] "Coapplicative"
makeDualDec [d
class Applicative f => Monad f where
$$(makeDualDec [d>>= :: f a > (a > f b) > f b] "=>>")
fail :: f ()
] "Comonad"
Defining the Dual of an Existing Thing
If one side of the construct already exists, then you can assign the duals like
makeDualType 'cata "ana"
makeDualType ''Algebra "Coalgebra"
makeDualClass ''Applicative "Coapplicative" [('pure, "extract")]
makeDualClass ''Monad "Comonad" [('(>>=) , "=>>")]
Labeling Existing Duals
Labeling is especially useful when things are duals of themselves.
labelSelfDual ''Functor
labelSelfDual 'fmap  not implied by the former because:
class Steppable t f  t > f where
project :: t > f t
embed :: f t > t
labelSelfDual ''Steppable
labelDual 'project 'embed
Also, if there are things that are both equivalent to some other thing, you can label one as “semidual”, mapping in one direction but not the other.
labelDual 'pure 'extract
 `return` is overconstrained, so we let it dualize to `extract`, but `extract`
 will be converted to `pure` on any return trip.
labelSemiDual 'return 'extract