A library for writing Imperative style haskell.

ImperativeHaskell alternatives and similar packages

Based on the "Control" category

• transient

  9.9 6.4 ImperativeHaskell VS transient

  Making composable programs with multithreading, events and distributed computing

• rio-orphans

  9.9 6.5 ImperativeHaskell VS rio-orphans

  Orphan instances for the RIO type in the rio package

• machines

  9.8 5.0 ImperativeHaskell VS machines

  Networked stream transducers

• pipes

  9.8 4.5 ImperativeHaskell VS pipes

  Compositional pipelines

• fused-effects

  9.8 9.9 ImperativeHaskell VS fused-effects

  A fast, flexible, fused effect system.

• funflow

  9.7 4.7 ImperativeHaskell VS funflow

  Workflows with arrows

• free

  9.6 5.2 ImperativeHaskell VS free

  Monads for free

• record

  9.6 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS record

  Anonymous records

• recursion-schemes

  9.6 6.8 ImperativeHaskell VS recursion-schemes

  Generalized bananas, lenses and barbed wire

• mtl

  9.6 4.0 ImperativeHaskell VS mtl

  Monad classes, using functional dependencies

• apecs

  9.6 - ImperativeHaskell VS apecs

  A fast ECS for game engine programming

• capability

  9.6 5.7 ImperativeHaskell VS capability

  Extensional capabilities and deriving combinators

• extensible-effects

  9.5 7.8 ImperativeHaskell VS extensible-effects

  An Alternative to Monad Transformers

• classy-prelude

  9.5 5.3 ImperativeHaskell VS classy-prelude

  A typeclass-based Prelude.

• classy-prelude-yesod

  9.5 - ImperativeHaskell VS classy-prelude-yesod

  Provide a classy prelude including common Yesod functionality.

• foldl

  9.5 4.5 ImperativeHaskell VS foldl

  Composable, streaming, and efficient left folds

• auto

  9.5 2.1 ImperativeHaskell VS auto

  Denotative, locally stateful programming DSL & platform

• freer-simple

  9.5 3.1 ImperativeHaskell VS freer-simple

  Implementation of a friendly effect system for Haskell.

• selective

  9.5 8.5 ImperativeHaskell VS selective

  Selective applicative functors

• hask

  9.4 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS hask

  Categories

• safe-exceptions

  9.4 0.3 ImperativeHaskell VS safe-exceptions

  Safe, consistent, and easy exception handling

• abstract-par

  9.4 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS abstract-par

  Type classes generalizing the functionality of the 'monad-par' library.

• frpnow

  9.3 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS frpnow

  Principled practical FRP

• ComonadSheet

  9.3 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS ComonadSheet

  A library for expressing spreadsheet-like computations as the fixed-points of comonads.

• transient-universe

  9.3 6.6 ImperativeHaskell VS transient-universe

  Remote execution and map-reduce

• distributed-process-platform

  9.2 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS distributed-process-platform

  The Cloud Haskell Application Platform

• pipes-core

  9.2 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS pipes-core

  Compositional pipelines

• these

  9.2 6.7 ImperativeHaskell VS these

  An either-or-both data type & a generalized 'zip with padding' typeclass

• either

  9.2 5.3 ImperativeHaskell VS either

  An either monad transformer

• distributed-closure

  9.2 3.7 ImperativeHaskell VS distributed-closure

  Serializable closures for distributed programming.

• retry

  9.2 4.1 ImperativeHaskell VS retry

  Retry combinators for monadic actions that may fail

• cloud-haskell

  9.1 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS cloud-haskell

  The Cloud Haskell Application Platform

• unliftio

  9.1 7.4 ImperativeHaskell VS unliftio

  The MonadUnliftIO typeclass for unlifting monads to IO (batteries included)

• parallel

  9.1 2.9 ImperativeHaskell VS parallel

  Parallel programming library

• tardis

  9.0 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS tardis

  Bidirectional state monad transformer

• contravariant

  9.0 5.4 ImperativeHaskell VS contravariant

  Contravariant functors

• operational

  9.0 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS operational

  Implementation of difficult monads made easy with operational semantics.

• exceptions

  8.9 5.7 ImperativeHaskell VS exceptions

  Extensible optionally-pure exceptions

• errors

  8.9 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS errors

  Simplified error-handling

• ifcxt

  8.9 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS ifcxt

  put if statements within type constraints

• deepseq

  8.9 3.1 ImperativeHaskell VS deepseq

  Deep evaluation of data structures

• monad-control

  8.9 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS monad-control

  Lift control operations, like exception catching, through monad transformers

• lens-tutorial

  8.8 2.5 ImperativeHaskell VS lens-tutorial

  Tutorial for the lens library

• objective

  8.8 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS objective

  Composable objects

• freer-effects

  8.8 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS freer-effects

  Implementation of effect system for Haskell.

• mmorph

  8.8 3.2 ImperativeHaskell VS mmorph

  Monad morphisms

• time-warp

  8.8 1.7 ImperativeHaskell VS time-warp

  Distributed systems execution emulation

• ixmonad

  8.7 0.0 ImperativeHaskell VS ixmonad

  Embeds effect systems into Haskell using parameteric effect monads

• ether

  8.7 2.3 ImperativeHaskell VS ether

  Monad transformers and classes

• motor

  8.7 5.1 ImperativeHaskell VS motor

  Type-safe effectful state machines in Haskell

Do you think we are missing an alternative of ImperativeHaskell or a related project?

Monitor and correlate metrics, traces, and logs in one platform. Free 14-day trial. More from our partner

Popular Comparisons

• ImperativeHaskell
  vs
  apecs
• ImperativeHaskell
  vs
  ConstraintKinds
• frpnow
  vs
  apecs
• cloud-haskell
  vs
  unpack-funcs
• pipes-conduit
  vs
  pipes-bytestring

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews More from our team